New York Moves to Regulate Prediction Markets Under Financial Oversight
New legislation would bring prediction markets under state financial supervision rather than treating them as gaming sites.
LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE:Lawmakers in Albany have reintroduced a bill that would place prediction-market platforms under the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), marking a potential turning point for a market that has expanded rapidly in recent years. Senate Bill S8889 proposes to amend the state’s Financial Services Law to create a specific licensing and supervisory regime for operators that let users take financial positions on future events.
New Oversight Would Require Licenses, AML Programs and Consumer Safeguards
Under S8889, any operator offering contracts tied to future occurrences – whether labeled as markets, contracts for difference or other instruments – would fall within the law’s scope. The bill tasks DFS with issuing licenses, performing examinations, imposing civil penalties and revoking approvals if operators fail to comply. Firms would need to show financial stability, governance controls and readiness to operate under anti-money laundering (AML) and consumer-protection standards similar to those that apply to other financial services firms.
Proponents argue the move addresses enforcement inconsistencies that have left investors and consumers exposed. ‘‘A licensing framework gives regulators the tools to evaluate who is entering the market and holds platforms to clear standards for disclosures, liquidity controls and anti-fraud measures’’, said a New York regulatory attorney who reviewed the draft and asked not to be named. ‘‘Without it, platforms can claim they are simply entertainment or information services to avoid oversight, which creates legal gray areas and inconsistent protections for users.’’
The bill’s language is deliberately broad: it focuses on the function of a product – allowing users to take financial positions on future events – rather than the label operators attach. That drafting choice appears designed to prevent firms from engineering around the law through semantic or product-design workarounds.
Related: Survey: 90% of Americans Support Access to Prediction Markets
More Regulation News
Regulation
Former Players and Fixers Charged in Scheme to Rig NCAA and CBA Basketball Games
Jan 16, 2026
Impact on Operators and Wider Policy Debate
If enacted, S8889 would force a change in how prominent platforms operate in New York. Exchanges such as Kalshi and Polymarket have driven public attention to prediction markets by offering contracts tied to economic indicators, political outcomes and other event-based benchmarks. Regulators and lawmakers in several states, including recent actions in Tennessee, have raised concerns about consumer protection and the public-policy implications of speculative markets tied to elections, mortality and individual stocks.
Supporters of a licensing approach say it creates a middle path between outright bans and the current hands-off approach. Assembly Bill 9251 – known as the ORACLE Act – represents the alternative, proposing strict limits and explicit prohibitions on markets linked to elections, deaths, equity prices and individual sports contests. The two proposals reflect a broader national debate: should prediction markets be treated as financial products subject to oversight, constrained as a form of gambling, or regulated by a hybrid regime?
‘‘Operators are going to face higher compliance costs and closer supervision, but that could also legitimise a sector that has lacked consistent rules’’, said an anonymous industry compliance consultant. ‘‘For well-capitalised firms with mature governance, regulation by the DFS could open the door to institutional participation. For smaller operators, the burden may be prohibitive.’’
The bill also touches on federal-state tension. Some industry stakeholders contend federal agencies such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have primary authority over derivative-style contracts, while states point to consumer protection and licensing as legitimate grounds for local oversight. S8889 appears designed to withstand pre-emption challenges by anchoring jurisdiction in the state’s financial-regulatory statutes and operational safeguards.
Where New York leads, other states often follow. Passage of S8889 would likely influence legislative and regulatory discussions in other major markets, shaping licensing models, permitted contract types and consumer-protection expectations nationwide. As prediction markets continue to evolve, the choice between licensing, prohibition or mixed regimes will determine who can operate, what products are available, and how risks are managed for ordinary users.
Further developments are expected as the bill moves through committee stages in the state legislature and during negotiations with stakeholders in financial services, consumer groups and the prediction-platform industry.
RELATED TOPICS: Regulation
Latest News
Regulation
Former Players and Fixers Charged in Scheme to Rig NCAA and CBA Basketball Games
Jan 16, 2026
Most Read
Must Read
Interviews
Exclusive Interview: Levon Nikoghosyan Shares AffPapa Winning Formula for Successful iGaming Events
Dec 03, 2025
Interviews
Review this New Post
Leave a Comment
User Comments
Comments for New York Moves to Regulate Prediction Markets Under Financial Oversight