Florida Lawmakers Move to Penalise Fixed-Event Wagering
Expertise: US Gaming, European Gaming Industry, iGaming
LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE:
The proposal, House Bill 189, introduced by Republican Representative Dana Trabulsy, would expand criminal liability to include any person who places a bet on a sporting contest – professional or amateur – when they are aware the outcome has been manipulated. The substitute version of the bill, released this week, updates existing statutes that already criminalize bribing athletes or officials to alter the result of a game.
Under the measure, a conviction for knowingly betting on a fixed match would carry the penalties associated with a third-degree felony in Florida, which can include prison time and significant fines. Sponsors say the change is designed to close a perceived loophole and strengthen deterrence at a time when match-fixing and betting-related corruption have resurfaced in public debate following recent criminal charges connected to alleged prop-betting schemes in Major League Baseball.
HB 189 is not an isolated proposal. Lawmakers packaged the anti-fixing language into a broader, near-100-page gambling bill that covers everything from pari‑mutuel racing and fantasy sports to administrative changes at the Florida Gaming Control Commission. The legislative summary says the package “strengthens penalties for illegal gambling, authorizes the operation of fantasy sports contests, clarifies employee prohibitions governing the Florida Gaming Control Commission, revises reporting requirements related to changes in ownership for pari‑mutuel wagering permit holders, and preempts local governments from regulating gaming activities unless expressly provided in Florida law”.
Political reporter Gary Fineout has flagged portions of the fantasy sports sections as potentially controversial, noting there appears to be no explicit carve‑out for small, informal fantasy leagues among friends or coworkers. He also reported the bill will be heard next week, a procedural signal that leadership is fast-tracking the measure through the House.
Beyond criminal provisions for bettors, the substitute would also make it a third-degree felony for any operator to run fantasy contests that hinge on game-level outcomes such as team scores or point spreads in violation of the bill’s conditions. Supporters contend that those restrictions are aimed at protecting game integrity and distinguishing lawful fantasy formats from gambling that mirrors traditional betting markets.
RELATED TOPICS: Regulation
Latest News
Responsible Gambling